Wednesday, 15 February 2017

Different Between Selenium Webdriver AND Django Framework?

The vital issue to understand concerning antioxidant is that it's primarily designed to be a server-agnostic testing framework. It does not matter what framework or server-side implementation is employed to form the front-end as long because it behaves of course. Also, whereas you'll (and once attainable you almost certainly should) write tests manually in antioxidant, several tests square measure recorded macros of somebody inquiring the motions that square measure then changed into code mechanically.On the opposite hand, django-webtest is made to figure specifically on Django websites. It's truly a Django-specific extension to WebTest, that isn't Django-only, however WSGI-only (and thus Python-only). thanks to that, it will act with the appliance with a better level of awareness of however things work on the server. this may build running tests quicker and might conjointly makes it straightforward to write down additional granular, careful tests. Also, not like antioxidant, your tests cannot be mechanically written as recorded macros.Otherwise, the 2 tools have typically an equivalent purpose and square measure meant to check an equivalent varieties of things. That said, i'd recommend choosing one instead of mistreatment each.

No comments:

Post a Comment